Most everything is connected to about any other thing, in some way. As a result you can be sure some part of what I say in this article, will essentially be what you’ve heard before.
I should also point out, when there have been ancillary discussions, relating to what’s spoken about in this piece, you probably should expect me to say the same, or at least very similar things, to what I express here.
Having made those disclaimers, allow me to get on with things.
Very few people would be surprised to hear me couch myself as a right leaning person. Some would be somewhat interested to hear me say that I’m not heavily to the right, in my perspectives and positions.
Being clear though, in my view, people who are strongly on that side of things, tend to advocate for at least anarcho-capitalism, if not straight anarchy.
I’ve said before and maintain now, that Socialism is a leftist philosophy, but Communism is an almost completely right wing one.
This confuses a lot of folks, so let me clarify. In my view, the closer something comes to anarchy, the more to the right, I consider it to be. Strong Socialism—including Nazism—tends to very much seek heavy government control, as such, it’s a leftist position.
At least in theory, true Communism expects people to come to a place, where they can all but self govern. That makes it so it’s a good deal closer to anarchy, than even many on the right, have any interest in.
For my part, I support the idea of a central government for a very limited set of things, with a more diffuse set of government bodies, for again, as limited a set of things, as possible.
The remainder of societal interaction should be left in the trust, of the population at large.
Though I very much consider myself moderate-right in my leanings, I have zero problem, with folks having both more right, and left based positions, holding forth on their beliefs.
This applies to the “standard,” and social, media.
That said, it’s an expectation on the part of many, that the media complex (read here, “Newspapers, television and radio news reports, and the like”), be impartial in their reporting.
I’ve said before, and maintain now, I have absolutely no illusion, that will be the case.
Even if the lines between editorial and unbiased news reporting weren’t totally blurred, I’m of a mind that people will be biased, on the simple basis, that they have particular beliefs.
This can be reduced in some measure, by having multiple hands involved in what’s reported and how.
It’s an ongoing problem though, that most news organizations operate within a culture. That culture—as with most any enterprise—has a tendency to be biased, in a given direction.
Want folks who’ll not spend their days rubbing their coworkers the wrong way? Hire individuals who have similar belief sets, to those already in place.
All considered, the media, whether news entities, or various types of editorial components, is considered by many (incorrectly), to be unbiased.
And I don’t by any means, give a pass to media outlets on the right, either. If they’re not as biased as the mainstream, it’s because they’re typically more so.
In fact, there’s a tendency on the part of rightist media, to—if it were possible—be more editorial in their point of view.
Social media is another matter. For those in that sphere, there’s an expectation of a true lack of bias on the part of the platforms, that exist.
That’s not to say the people who work in such companies, have no bias. Neither is it true, that from a content perspective, various social media entities, will not have a potential tilt, in one direction or the other.
The truth is, where it’s allowed, there tend to be raucous voices in both directions, as well as some who’re more centrist in their outlooks.
The problem though is, the people who both own and more importantly run many social media platforms, have a tendency towards bias, which creeps into their management philosophies.
Equally important, is the fact that many who work for the businesses in question, either institute of their own accord, or in deference to their tech overlords, policies for various types of filtering, bans, and censorship, that generate a distinct bias, in the direction of the ownership or management of such entities.
Considering the businesses in question are literally protected by law, from being counted as content providers, such a tendency is untenable to say the least.
Simply put, it should be the mantra of social media entities, to provide a platform, and to do so without political bias.
If filtering, censorship, or bans of any kind occur, it should be on the basis of legality.
As I’ve said before, I’m in complete support of people being able to say (and even do, where there’s no illegality involved), things I consider entirely repugnant in nature.
That works for what’s put on various platforms that supposedly purvey social content, just as much as anywhere else.
In my mind, you should literally be allowed to publish outright falsehoods.
It should be the task of those consuming what makes its way out there, to work to decide what’s true, and what’s not.
None of that activity ought to be undertaken by the platform owners.
You saw that Jennifer Lopez, had a baby with a martian dad? To begin with, I think you maybe should take that with a grain (maybe a barrel) of salt.
At that point, it’s on you, whether or not you do the research to determine the veracity of the claim, or claims made.
Social media not only shouldn’t have to fact check for you, they really have no reason to assume they ought to take such actions.
So I don’t consider the media nor social media, to present perfect fact, in all instances. Of the two, it’s hard to say which is less prone to do so. In the case of social media though, the source is not the platform. As such, it should be possible to make determinations, on likely validity of that presented, if you’re able to readily determine who’s saying what. It’s not the job of social media platforms to determine correctness of information, nor to fact-check in any way. That’s my two cents. Take it for what it’s worth.
Thanks for reading, and may your time be good.